
[Top] Photo © Angela Sterling
Photography
|
"It
was so quiet; and you felt the power of his dancing, but he
didn't wear it on his sleeve. He just let you get inside.
I think he has just rounded out his presence in the right
direction."
-- Peter Boal, artistic director of the Pacific Northwest
Ballet
Finding
the Artist Within
Known for his unbounded
energy onstage, Jonathan Porretta finds the artist within without
losing touch with his audience.
By Rosie Gaynor
|
|
No one
expected Jonathan Porretta to rest upon his laurels once Pacific
Northwest Ballet promoted him to principal. He is, after all, the
dancer to whom Seattle Weekly attributed "the stamina
of a dozen men and women," a man "charged with a primordial
energy leached from the bowels of the earth." Of course, someone
with that kind of get-up-and-go would continue to grow. He didn't
just continue to grow, however, he re-invented himself as an artist.
In the process, Porretta risked losing one
of the attributes that distinguishes him as a dancer; his relationship
with the audience. Pacific Northwest Ballet has other technically
proficient dancers who can -- and do -- reach across the footlights
to the audience, but Porretta practically jumps into your lap. His
outrageous charm energizes us; we love his dazzling bravura, his
bigger-than-Broadway smile, the contagious joy he evinces while
performing. He never holds anything back.
Porretta's vibrant personality manifested early
on. Not long after he started dance classes (a present for his seventh
birthday), Porretta's teachers began preparing him for competitions
-- more than 10 a year, all over the state -- giving him his earliest
lessons in performing. He usually did solos in every category (ballet,
tap, jazz, lyrical), plus duets, and small and large ensembles.
The set-up didn't vary, however.
"There were always three judges in the
front," Porretta explains, "and you were performing for
them. You had to stare at those judges; you had to smile at those
judges; and if you were doing a lyrical piece, you had to be emotional
and convey those emotions to the judges." These directives
came from the teachers. "As much as they would teach you your
dancing -- 'point your feet here, do another turn there' -- they
also said, 'look at the judges here, smile more here.'"
|
At 14, Porretta joined the School of
American Ballet. How did they respond to his outgoing energy
at that elite temple of serious study? Porretta's warm brown
eyes start to twinkle: "I think they tried to tone me
down." But that didn't particularly bother him. "You
have to be able to focus in the studio. Just tone it down
and be calm," he says. "Not that I'm a calm person
by any stretch of the imagination! But I tried to be. I wanted
to fit in as much as possible. I was a total Jersey boy in
the city with all these New Yorkers. It was very exciting.
I was quiet, actually. And then when I got to be onstage,
I could break out."
Performance opportunities being (relatively) limited at the
School of American Ballet, Porretta kept up with outside competitions,
winning his last one -- Teen Mr. Dance -- at age 16. By then,
he had found another outlet for performance, with Dances Patrelle.
He was "just phenomenal" in these performances,
says Pacific Northwest Ballet Artistic Director Peter Boal,
adding that he appreciates Porretta's "splashy"
side. "More often than not," Boal says, "dancers
are not conscious that they have to engage as in a conversation
with an audience." For Porretta, he concludes, it comes
naturally.
Porretta worked
hard to focus during his years at the School of American Ballet,
but that didn't quash his love of fun or his passion for performing.
Case in point?
|
[Top] Photo
© Angela Sterling Photography
|
Boal tells the story of watching an old
class videotape: in the back, while the teacher corrected another
student, there was Porretta, dancing Kitri, the ballerina from Don
Quixote. "Porretta had license to get away with things like that,
because he was smart and on top of things. He knew every combination;
he knew the musicality you were looking for. He was incredibly receptive
to corrections. So we gave him a loose leash
as far as doing
Kitri in the back corner."
And not just Kitri. One profile on Porretta
(ballet-dance.com, 2005) recounts how he happened to be joking around,
doing Odile's 32 Swan Lake fouettés and ending in
a Dying Swan position, on the very day that Pacific Northwest
Ballet's founding co-artistic director, Kent Stowell, happened to
be watching class. The punch line? Stowell offered Porretta a job
that same day.
Since that day in 1999, Seattle has seen Porretta in more than 50
roles at Pacific Northwest Ballet -- not Kitri or Odile, but Mercutio,
Puck, Mopey; Stowell even re-choreographed the Jester in his Swan
Lake to take advantage of Porretta's technical brilliance. It
seemed as though every season Porretta moved faster, jumped higher
and forged a stronger connection with the audience. And then, during
the 2004-2005 season, Porretta hit a new high. "That was my
year of soloist getting promoted to principal -- probably the greatest
season I will ever have in my career," says Porretta. In addition
to dancing the thrilling Bach-meets-Africa Lambarena and a made-to-fit
jazzy romp, Dual Lish, he interpreted with succès
fou the punishing lead roles in Balanchine's heart-wrenching
Prodigal Son and Tetley's soul-gripping
Rite of Spring. The
latter presented the dancer and audience alike one of those rare,
total mind-body-spirit experiences. Francia Russell, founding co-artistic
director of Pacific Northwest Ballet, was quoted at the time as
saying: "The audience knows there is nothing he won't give
onstage."

[Top] Photo ©
Angela Sterling Photography
|
Enter choreographer Victor Quijada, with
a commission from Boal to create a new work for Pacific Northwest
Ballet. The dancers were open, eager and game for anything,
says Quijada.
"It was like a completely foreign
country," says Porretta. "Craziness. It was very
weird." Porretta wasn't commenting on Quijada's remarkable
movement, but rather about how Quijada performs his pieces.
"It was not to the audience; it was never about performing
to the audience," explains Porretta.
"What I was proposing to
the dancers at Pacific Northwest Ballet was: 'Let's be present.
Whatever is happening in that presence, we'll amplify and
allow the audience to be part of it,'" says Quijada.
|
Since Quijada has ties to hip-hop, Porretta
visited Seattle's War Room to get a feel for the art form. "The
street dancers here in Seattle are brilliant," Porretta says.
"In a hip-hop circle, the dancers may be showing off, but they're
also working from within themselves. They're not looking out. It's
inside. It's your own thing and you're sharing it with other people,
but it's really just about your experience with the movement. We
had to learn how to perform like that."
The inward-focus approach worked well for Quijada's
Suspension of Disbelief, which scored a major success in
Seattle. But while it might work for certain mood pieces, it can
get stale on the ballet stage. Picture the languid ballerina who
keeps her vacant eyes forever downcast. Or, worse, the artist who
is so into his own self that the audience has no point of access.
"Inward" seemed antithetical to who Porretta was as a
dancer.

[Top] Photo © Angela Sterling Photography
|
Nevertheless, this experience with Quijada
set a major change in motion. Porretta made a conscious decision
to interact differently with the audience. He experimented
with inward focus in class and kept learning -- from his colleagues,
from visiting choreographers (among them, Jean-Christophe
Maillot and Twyla Tharp) and from works such as Molissa Fenley's
marathon State of Darkness, where the dancer communicates
through movements as small as a slight twitter of the hand.
"That," says Porretta, "taught me a lot about
performing."
Porretta didn't view this sea of change
as a risk. However, what if the audience didn't like his new
presence? Would that matter? "The greatest thing about
performing is when you feel the energy from the audience,"
Porretta says, passionately. "That's what feeds you as
you're performing." That, was at risk.
It is naive -- though tempting -- to
believe that every artist who keeps exploring his art and
himself will prevail. It worked for Porretta, though. He has
discovered how to use his whole body when connecting with
the audience and he did not lose his individuality in the
process. And whereas before we knew exactly what kind of fireworks
to expect from him, now we have the fun of surprise.
Who in the
audience would have guessed, years ago, that Porretta could
reveal, as Boal describes it, "a side that is so refined
and so subtle"?
|
Boal points to Porretta's solo in Square
Dance, one year after Quijada's fateful visit: "It was so
quiet; and you felt the power of his dancing, but he didn't wear it
on his sleeve. He just let you get inside. I think he has just rounded
out his presence in the right direction." <end>
[top]
|
|
[REVIEW]
Ballets Russes at Boston Ballet
By Theodore Bale
During the recent wealth of Ballets Russes-related
activities in Boston and Cambridge, I was reminded of the
first staging I saw of The Rite of Spring by Martha
Graham, at the New York State Theater, in the late winter
of 1984. That was an unforgettable evening, not in the least
because Graham made a powerful curtain call dressed in a Halston
gown, her hair impeccably styled in what looked liked two
enormous conch shells. The audience leapt to a standing ovation,
but this seemed more like respectful applause for the legend
rather than for Graham's own version of the modern masterpiece.
Terese Capucilli danced the Chosen One.
There was a lot of thick rope onstage, and the male elders
carried huge wooden sticks to bang on the stage floor. I remember
thinking, however, that something crucial was missing, as
if the ballet had been diluted from its original essence to
something less outrageous, even if the production had centered
on rape.
That was the same year I witnessed work
that struck me as shockingly new -- Lucinda Childs' field
dances for Philip Glass' and Robert Wilson's Einstein on
the Beach, Pina Bausch's epic Bluebeard at the
Brooklyn
|
| Academy of Music and
Mark Morris' early dances at various venues, to mention only
a few. In this context, Graham's Rite couldn't help but
look old-fashioned. My only reference to the original ballet,
prior to Millicent Hodson and Kenneth Archer's skillful later
reconstruction of Nijinsky's choreography, was Herbert Ross'
overwrought 1980 film, Nijinsky, with a stoic George
de la Peña in the title role screaming out those compound
rhythms from the wings. The extensive mythology of Rite
had entered my consciousness.
Over the past 25 years I have seen numerous
versions, from Shen Wei's emphatic, monochromatic abstraction
to Yvonne Rainer's recent and deeply theoretical ROS Indexical.
Taking on this ballet, so loaded with psychological and aesthetic
baggage, requires a choreographer with very sharp intuition.
I've come to realize that most of the successful versions
acknowledge the inherent binary oppositions in the original
scenario, which seem somehow constant in Stravinsky's notorious
and bi-tonal score (it is not atonal as some would prefer
to describe). The Rite of Spring presented day and
night, male and female, life and death, youth and old-age,
the individual and society. At the abstract level, Nijinsky
captured buoyancy and weight, polyrhythm, the horizontal and
the vertical, and the beginnings of an aesthetic of repetition,
particularly in the dance of the Chosen One. The question
for living choreographers, it seems, is whether or not to
ignore the basic form and intent of Nijinsky's original production.
|
The success of Mexican choreographer
Jaime Blanc's version for the Harvard Dance Center,
which premiered in May, comes from his intelligent exploration
of oppositions and a sophisticated look at the available
performers, both young and old. The premiere was an
outgrowth of a class at Harvard. Preceding performances
of La Consagración de la Primavera, former
principal dancer and artistic director laureate of the
Martha Graham Dance Company, Christine Dakin, taught
a weekly seminar at Harvard titled "Rite of Spring
at the Nexus of Art and Ritual." She also danced
a secondary role, the Ancestress, along with her students
and Harvard alumni. Already, there was an opposition
-- the experienced Dakin and a group of enthusiastic
students. Intriguingly, the production completes a spiral
of connection to the original; Graham danced the Chosen
One in Massine's re-working of Nijinsky, while Dakin
danced the Chosen One in Graham's version beginning
in the 1980s.
Blanc, who served as associate
artistic director and choreographer of Ballet Nacional
de Mexico for 35 years (he has since established his
own company, Teatro Coreográfico Alternativo),
is unknown to audiences in greater Boston. I was deeply
impressed by his ability to rein this
|
 |
production into its final realization,
exploiting the talents and experience of a former Graham star
while giving the students reasonable yet dramatic movement.
At a Harvard symposium running simultaneously
with his premiere, Blanc said that his scenario was suggested
by his childhood in Oaxaca, where he explained that "women
are very smart and run things." He added that he was also
influenced by a sense of ancient southern Mexican ritual as
well as contemporary Catholicism. Consequently, his staging
is refreshingly non-sexist, even if the Chosen One is stripped
of her mummy-like costume (made from endless yards of scrim-like
cotton) and forced to dance to her demise. It seems that the
women are shaping this event and the men are obeying them. Yes,
there are echoes of Clytemnestra in Dakin's solos, but she is
such a seasoned performer that Blanc saw no reason to ignore
her attributes. The choreography was as dense as it needed to
be and highly cognizant of the intricacies of the score, constantly
unfolding into a spectacular ritual.
By contrast, Jorma Elo's new version
of Rite for Boston Ballet is lavish and the
binary opposites of the original scenario seriously diminished.
The premiere on May 14 at the Wang Theatre was part of the
company's Ballets Russes Centennial Celebration, which included
exquisite stagings of Prodigal Son by Richard Tanner,
Le Spectre de la Rose by Isabelle Fokine and Afternoon
of a Faun by Ghislaine Thesmar. Elo's Rite was
the only premiere and when the curtain rose to reveal a thin
line of actual flames upstage (by effects specialists Jauchem
and Meeh), it was difficult not to gasp. The flames, in various
configurations, remained throughout. They were successful
as a kind of metaphor for primitivism, though the spectacle
eventually dominated the choreography. It was as if once this
concept was secured (perhaps with local fire authorities),
the dancing became an afterthought.
 |
I happen to love Elo's
reckless virtuosity. He likes accomplished, versatile
dancers with perfect articulation and confident classical
technique. The women usually wear pointe shoes. The spine,
in all its permutations, is a certain focus for him, with
the dancers always using the back and torso in a highly
expressive manner. That was evident here, but it seems
that Elo's most successful works are more often chamber
ballets. Rite forced the same problem on him as
his failed Carmen -- how to manage a large ensemble.
Blanc had an accomplished modern
dance diva to anchor his version, but the 16 dancers in
Elo's Rite come off as an unlikely flock. Certain
|
dancers (Yury Yanowsky, Larissa Ponomarenko,
Sabi Varga and Lorna Feijóo) emerge occasionally from
the group, starry-eyed, but with little dramatic effect. It's
hardly a flop, but I felt myself working hard to love the piece
or to discern any scenario. Those flames, along with Charles
Heightchew's glam-rock red-sequin costumes, made this attempt
at spectacle seem more desperate and showy than well-considered.
-- Theodore Bale
<end>
[top]
|
|
 |
[REVIEW]
Diaghilev Seasons Festival in Russia
By Elizabeth Stern
Perm, a provincial city located at the edge
of Siberia and the Ural Mountains, is a city of paradoxes. Today,
when you ask Russians what they think of when they hear the name
Perm, they associate it most commonly with two things: the gulag
and ballet. This Soviet city, with its checkered history, is where
Sergei Diaghilev, the great impresario and creator of the Ballets
Russes, came of age. Perm now hosts the eight-year-old biennial
Diaghilev Seasons Festival. This year it brought representatives
from Moscow, St. Petersburg, Paris and 14 other countries to Perm
for a nine-day festival of ballet, opera, concerts, exhibitions,
cinema and
|
conferences. From May 15-23, the festival presented
some 14 balletic works, half of which were choreographed within the last
10 years. The long trip to the festival was well worth the effort.
Created in 1909 by Diaghilev, the Ballets Russes
was intended to be the intersection and showcase of all the Russian arts.
Diaghilev brought Russian painting, music, costumes, set designs, dancers
and choreographers to Western Europe in his Russian Seasons repertoire as
a means of proving Russia's artistic immediacy and bringing about a revitalization
of the arts, specifically ballet. Diaghilev created a fanciful image of
a creatively imagined historical Russia. He ushered in the era of modern
ballet. He was the Renaissance man of Silver Age Russia, leaving no aspect
of the arts untouched. The Diaghilev Seasons Festival is a tribute to this
man who changed the world of art and ballet irrevocably. As festival organizer
Oleg Levenkov explains: "The festival is not simply a retrospective;
the most important idea behind the festival is the idea Diaghilev himself
had -- the creation and presentation of new works." The festival, celebrating
the centennial of the Ballets Russes, did not disappoint.
Alexei Ratmansky's Russian Seasons, performed
by the Bolshoi, was a perfect start to the festival. Ratmansky, a native
of St. Petersburg, having ended a challenging stint as director of the
Bolshoi, is now artist-in-residence at American Ballet Theatre. His piece
echoes the more primitive works of the Ballets Russes (i.e. Nijinska)
that sought inspiration from ancient Russian culture. This compelling
work seems drawn straight from the palettes of Russian avant-garde painters:
the bold, saturate colours of Petrov Vodkin, the dynamism and dizzying
sense of movement of Malyavin's portraits of peasant life, and the raw
grandeur of Goncharova.
Russian Seasons, made up of six couples, presents
a microcosm of Russian village society. It is about youthful passions,
nascent emotions and their developments, and it fuses classical ballet
steps with the streamlined, colloquial vocabulary of Slavic folk dance.
The work and its score are loosely based on the Russian Orthodox Church
calendar, and play with the theme of what constitutes "Russianness."
Leonid Desyatnikov's score, composed in 2002 (not
originally for ballet), waxes lyrical and dissonant - with its haunting
melodies reminiscent of Copland, aided by the vocal talents of Yana Ivanilova.
Desyatnikov considers Ratmansky's choreography "probably the most
fitting embodiment of my music in ballet." Indeed, Ratmansky's choreography
is extremely musical. His play with quick directional shifts, combinations
executed at breakneck speeds, and his wonderful sense of phrasing and
rhythmic pacing cannot help but recall another émigré Russian
choreographer who founded the company for which Ratmansky first choreographed
this piece -- the legendary George Balanchine. Ratmansky has a profound
use of space and compositional grouping and pairings. His distillations
of traditional line dances and the Russian "khorovod," sometimes
panning out in a kind of canon between dancers, are particularly clever.
This technically demanding ballet is diffused with a sense of both playfulness
and anxiety. The dancers oscillate between moments of reverie, frolicsome
games and vague dismay. The ballet seems to focus on two primary storylines:
the couple in orange and the girl in red.
The stunning Natalia Osipova reprised her role as
the rebellious soloist in red. She seems to fight against the expectations
of the group, which circles around her, only at the end of her solo to
lock arms back to back with her partner, Denis Savin. The two slowly sink
to the ground, letting their heads rest on the other's shoulder, in a
feeling of surrender. Osipova, who turned just 23 in May, performed her
part with an earthiness, a kind of violence and maturity beyond her years.
Ekaterina Shipulina, performing to a hometown crowd,
was superb in the lead role, which was first created for Wendy Whelan
in 2006. She gave an impression of disaffected fragility, of aching loss,
of latent agony in the face of time, growth and aging. Shipulina, changing
from an orange dress to nuptial white, moves in elegiac lament to Desyatnikov's
dirge-like music, as if she is mourning the loss of her youth and apparently
that of a loved one.
Performed the same night by the
Bolshoi, Twyla Tharp's In the Upper Room is a relatively new
addition to the repertoire in Russia. Originally premiered in 1986,
and well known in the West, the piece was only added to the Bolshoi's
programme in 2007, thanks to Ratmansky's modernizing influence. Tharp's
work is always a showstopper, with its pulsating score by Phillip
Glass and the giddy athleticism of its choreography. The work drives
on, like an overheating train engine, creating a heightened sense
of anticipation in the audience. While still exciting, the piece,
some 23 years old, is beginning to feel a bit dated, resembling a
glorified, if hypnotic 1980s aerobics class.
Giselle was also performed at the festival, by the Perm Ballet with
soloists from the Paris Opera Ballet -- the husband-and-wife duo,
Clairemarie Osta and Nicolas Le Riche. The set designs, costumes and
lighting were breathtaking. The first act was diffused with a lovely
golden light and the lush, georgic beauty of an autumn in the French
countryside. This romantic warhorse of a ballet, however, fit somewhat
clumsily into the festival's programme of newer works.
Osta is a diminutive, but wide-shouldered ballerina, who physically
fit the role of Giselle, yet nevertheless failed to convey the shy
girlishness of her |
 |
character. Her technique was solid and footwork
precise, but her extensions and adagio were mediocre. The mad scene, in
which she goes through the same series of steps of broken memory, was not
as moving as it should have been. Le Riche is a dancer of great reputation
-- the last protégé of Nureyev, former partner of Sylvie Guillem
and considered one of the best male dancers of the last 50 years. Le Riche
was, however, replaced by Perm's own Robert Gabdullin in the second act,
after he suffered an injury. Gabdullin, who performed in a number of other
works as well, was a pleasing substitution, even if the change in cast broke
the continuity of the performance. Originally from Yekaterinburg, Gabdullin,
with his dark majestic features, beautiful line and a statuesque physique
is extremely well suited to danseur noble roles.
Natalia Makina, of the Perm Ballet, who danced the
role of Myrtha, the chilling wraith-queen of the Wilis, was excellent.
With her sinewy form, wonderful rotation and control in her legs, and
her somewhat stiff, if regal, upper body, she gave an intense portrayal
of the icy fury of her character. The Perm Ballet, considered the third
best ballet company in Russia, has had a well-established ballet scene
since the Second World War, when teachers and dancers from the famous
Vaganova Academy were evacuated during the siege and blockade of Leningrad.
Casting-Off, performed by Evgeny Panfilov's
ballet company, is a relatively new work by the promising young choreographer
Larisa Aleksandrova, from Moscow. Aleksandrova's piece is a theatrical
exploration of gender roles, love, fate and the attraction (and trappings)
of domesticity. The work relies heavily on innovative costuming that serves
multiple functions. The costumes (sack-type dresses and then hoop-skirts)
and props (such as orange yarn) do not hinder or act as gimmicky substitutes
for legitimate choreography, but rather become instruments and extensions
of the choreography itself. Casting-off, despite some of its darker
overtones, is charming and touching and full of dramatic choreographic
moments.
The one-act work Medea for the Perm Ballet
was presented by Yuri Possokhov, formerly of the Bolshoi, and now choreographer-in-residence
at the San Francisco Ballet. The work, also known as Damned, was
first created in 2002. The ballet is based on Euripides' classic tragedy
of the betrayed sorceress Medea, who is driven to commit the gruesome
crime of filicide. It evoked the retrospective Hellenism that so characterized
the Silver Age Russian artistic scene, which Fokine, Balanchine and especially
Nijinsky also tapped into. Medea is set to the music of Ravel --
a composer who worked with the Ballets Russes. Unfortunately, Possokhov's
choreography is not particularly musical or innovative in its use of classical
ballet vocabulary. There was something of an anachronistic mismatch of
plot, choreography and music. Possokhov's use of the corps (dressed in
beautifully flowing white skirts, white close-cropped braided wigs and
masks) was far more successful than his choreography for the soloists.
 |
Ring, created by the
young choreographer Aleksei Miroshnichenko, is a contemporary work
set to the eclectic score of St. Petersburg hip-hop group the 2H Company.
Originally created for the Maryinsky Ballet in 2007, Miroshnichenko
brought the work to Perm. This meta-balletic work is set on a bare
stage, meant to resemble a dance studio -- darkly lit with a series
of lamps overhead and penned in by ballet barres lining the three
sides of the stage. The mercurial referee or ringmaster of this balletic
circus controls, evaluates and manipulates the dancers around him,
like a schizophrenic, tyrant ballet master. Two couples, dressed in
black and white, embellished practice attire, vie with one another,
followed by their respective "packs" of similarly dressed
corps members. The work is something of a cheeky commentary on the
daily grind of a ballet dancer -- class, rehearsal, performance. Ring
gives a stylized glimpse into the |
competitive and unforgiving world of dance, where
sacrifice, competition and even a certain degree of masochism are countered
by the fleeting exuberance of performance.
William Forsythe's In The Middle Somewhat Elevated,
performed by the Maryinsky Ballet, was spectacular as always and a wonderful
final piece for the festival. Originally created for the incomparable
Sylvie Guillem, then of the Paris Opera, the Maryinsky has had this piece
in its repertorie since 2004, and it suits the lanky Kirov dancers well.
Dressed in greenish-blue leotards and black tights, the dancers test the
very limits of the human body, with wild extensions and exaggerated displacements
of the body. Irina Golub, paired with Mikhail Lobukhin, brings a slinky
eroticism to this invigorating work. The lithe Ekaterina Kondaurova is
mesmerizing with her scissor-sharp hyper-extended limbs and her cool confidence.
Forsythe's edgy and starkly neoclassical choreography still feels fresh
and novel even 22 years after its premiere. As I overheard a few Russians
say to each other while exiting the theatre: "I wish the piece was
even longer!"
The Diaghilev Seasons Festival is a triumphant
testament to an artistic mindset that forever altered ballet, both inside
and out of Russia. -- Elizabeth H. Stern
<end>
[top]
|